Ten connected investigations into how teacher employment works, how decisions are made and what the published records can actually establish.
10research strands with reviewed evidence
Evidence checked 2026-09-16. Gaps stay visible instead of being converted into zeros or assumptions.
How to read this section
Question → evidence → limit → source.
Each investigation separates what a document says from what would require further evidence. Published policies describe rules; responses describe recorded answers; neither automatically proves how every individual case was handled.
01Partly established
Permanency · Temporary contracts
Routes to permanence are not the same across councils
The reviewed documents show that qualifying service is only one part of the route. Councils describe different windows, continuity rules, application processes and outcomes.
When temporary work continues after a contract ends
The research separates a legitimate temporary need from a continuing role. It sets out the post history, funding, vacancy and service records needed before drawing conclusions.
Follow the funding from announcement to staffing outcome
Funding announcements, allocations, staffing conditions and permanent-job outcomes are different stages. The public site keeps those stages separate instead of treating an allocation as proof of a permanent post.
A vacancy can pass through several staffing obligations before open recruitment. The investigation records the documented sequence without assuming that every council operates the same order.
Procurement records can show that a booking platform exists, but they do not show how individual bookings are ranked or distributed. The investigation separates the platform, council rules and actual allocation outcomes.
The investigation treats cover demand as a separate question from teacher availability. A supply list can contain available teachers while a school is still operating under separate authorisation or funding rules.
Permanent supply is not a new idea. Historical and current records show several models, but names alone do not establish guaranteed hours, current operation or effectiveness.
The investigation uses the published Fair Work dimensions as a benchmark for questions about security, opportunity, fulfilment, respect and effective voice. It does not assign councils a campaign score.
Headcount, post FTE, employment type, pay collections and supply-list entries answer different questions. The explainer prevents a single headline from being treated as a complete measure of secure employment.